Seated Statue of the Nomarch Idu II of Dendera
Description
Statue, Nomarch Idu II. Old Kingdom, Dynasty 6, reign of Pepi II, ca. 2246–2152 B.C. Limestone, traces of pigment. H: 60.5 cm (23 13/16 in.). From: Tomb of Idu II, Pit, Dendera, Northern Upper Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Egypt Exploration Fund excavations, 1898. Subject: Men. Credit: Gift of Egypt Exploration Fund, 1898.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A seated ancient Egyptian limestone statue of a male figure wearing a tripartite wig and holding writing materials across his lap.
The artifact shows a nude-to-draped seated male statue with legs drawn forward on a rectangular/stepped base. The figure wears a large wig with layered curls; the face has simplified modeling with downcast eyes and a defined nose and mouth. On the chest and lap there are carved details suggesting a sash or garment and multiple hands/objects: the left side appears to hold a flat rectangular tablet or document-like object, while the right hand rests near/over another item. The torso includes a small vertical element in the center that could be a carved emblem or clasp, though it is not sufficiently clear to identify. The overall surface is worn and chipped, with missing areas at the base and around the arms/hands. Faint traces of pigment are visible on parts of the base and/or the surface, consistent with the catalogue note. No legible inscriptions, cartouches, or named deities are clearly readable in the image.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116247797 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 98.4.9 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 552339 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.