Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Necklace with beads and a scarab

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Second Intermediate Period–Early New Kingdom, ca. 1991–1450 B.C. Hematite. L: 26 cm (10 1/4 in.);Scarab: H. 0.6 × W. 0.8 × L. 1.1 cm (1/4 × 5/16 × 7/16 in.). From: Tomb CC 24, Asasif, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon excavations. Credit: Purchase, Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1926.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A round-bead necklace made of dark, highly reflective beads, with a small scarab-like element at the top of the strand.

The image shows a necklace displayed against a light background. Most of the strand is composed of evenly sized, dark spherical to ovoid beads with a metallic/glossy surface. At least one small central element at the upper left appears slightly different in shape and could represent a scarab component; however, the figure is too small and indistinct to confirm a scarab with certainty. The joining elements at the ends appear to be small cord/fastener pieces rather than inscriptions. No clear hieroglyphs, cartouches, or legible Greek/Coptic/Arabic text are visible.

decorative Second Intermediate Period–Early New Kingdom (per catalogue ground truth) good
Materials dark stonepolished beads (likely hematite as catalogued)

Connections

Found at Asasif
Materials Dark Stone

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116247713 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 26.7.1379 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 552390 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.