Strings used to bind papyrus
Description
Scribe's strings. Late Period, Dynasty 26–30, 664–332 B.C. Plant fiber. Not measured. From: Tomb MMA 804 (M04), Forecourt rubbish, Sheikh Abd el-Qurna, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1913–14. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1914.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small bundle of brown, twisted fiber cords/coiled strings laid in a shallow circular dish, with a few colored (purple and reddish) threads attached at one point.
The image shows a loose cluster of multiple twisted plant-fiber strands (cords/strings) gathered into an irregular coil. Several ends protrude in different directions, suggesting a flexible binding element. Near the middle-left of the coil there are small colored thread segments (notably purple and some reddish staining/threads) that appear attached to the binding strands; the rest of the fibers are uniformly brown. No carved or painted iconography, sculpture, or formal inscription panels are visible. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text are present; any markings visible appear incidental or too indistinct to read. The object is consistent in appearance with the catalogue description of strings used to bind papyrus: thin, fibrous cords rather than metal or stone.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116247288 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 14.1.393f, g tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 552481 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.