Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Thoth Amulet

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Amulet, Thoth. Late Period–Ptolemaic Period, Dynasty 26–30, 664–30 B.C. Faience. H. 5.1 cm (2 in.). From: Egypt. Credit: Gift of Darius Ogden Mills, 1904.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small turquoise-blue glazed amulet-shaped figure standing upright, with arms held close to the body and a simplified head/face.

The image shows a single small object photographed against a plain light background. The object has a turquoise/blue-green surface consistent with a glazed ceramic (faience) look, with a simplified human-like figure standing on a rectangular base. The head is rounded with minimal facial features; the figure’s arms are drawn close along the torso. A prominent circular/raised element is visible on the chest/upper torso area. The overall form resembles a figurative amulet rather than an inscribed plaque. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text are visible in the photo, and no cartouche is discernible. The object’s details are weathered but the glazelike coloration and small scale are evident.

religious Late Period–Ptolemaic Period (as catalogued; no clear inscriptions visible to refine further) good
Deities Thoth (attributed by catalogue; not explicitly visible in inscriptions in this photo)
Materials faience (glazed ceramic appearance)turquoise-blue glaze

Connections

Deities Thoth

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116246402 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 04.2.370 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 552689 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.