Leopard-Head Seal Inscribed with the Throne Name of Amenhotep I
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Amenhotep I, ca. 1525–1504 B.C. Steatite, glazed. L. 1.2 × W. 0.9 × H. 0.6 cm (1/2 × 3/8 × 1/4 in.). From: Egypt. Credit: Theodore M. Davis Collection, Bequest of Theodore M. Davis, 1915.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
An oval Egyptian scarab/seal-type object with an incised hieroglyphic design filled in green/black pigment on a glazed surface.
The image shows a small oval/rounded artifact photographed against a plain background. The surface appears coated with a green glaze, with darker (black/brown) incised lines forming an emblem-like design. Within the central field there is a rectangular/arched motif and several vertical strokes that resemble hieroglyphic signs, but the exact sign forms are not clear enough to confidently read. No clearly defined animal head (e.g., a leopard head) is visibly resolved from this view; the central glyph-like composition dominates the face. The rim shows a thin, lighter band suggesting fired/painted edge or glaze pooling. No additional inscriptions in other scripts (Greek/Coptic/Arabic) are visible. No cartouche/clear throne-name enclosure is legible at this resolution.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116244500 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 30.8.483 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 554723 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.