Tablet from a foundation deposit of King Mentuhotep II
Description
Foundation Deposit Tablet, Mentuhotep II. Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 11, reign of Mentuhotep II, ca. 2060–2010 B.C. Wood. H. 14 × W. 5.8 cm (5 1/2 × 2 5/16 in.). From: Temple of Mentuhotep II, foundation deposit, SE corner, Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1920–22. Subject: Cartouches, Hieroglyphs. Credit: Rogers Fund and Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1922.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small rectangular wooden tablet inscribed with a vertical column of incised Egyptian hieroglyphs, topped by an emblem-like sign and including several seated/standing figures in the text area.
The image shows a single, vertically oriented wooden tablet with a smooth face and darker incised hieroglyphic lines. The hieroglyphs run in one main vertical sequence near the center of the tablet. At the top there is an emblem-like grouping of signs (possibly a cartouche/royal protocol sign or a specialized title-form), below which a human/figure-sign appears followed by a series of vertical hieroglyphs. Near the lower middle are additional grouped signs, including a circular/looped element and what looks like a small plant or lotus-like sign adjacent to other characters. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is visible. The condition appears intact and the surface is evenly lit, with the incisions clearly legible as hieroglyphic forms but too unclear in places to confidently read a specific royal name.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116252078 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 22.3.187 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 544002 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.