Funerary Figure of Qebehsenuef
Description
Funerary Figure, Qebehsenuef. Late Period–Ptolemaic Period, ca. 400–30 B.C. Plastered and painted wood. H. 39.7 cm (15 5/8 in.); W. 11.5 cm (4 1/2 in.); D. 25.7 cm (10 1/8 in.). Said to be from: Tuna el-Gebel, Middle Egypt. Subject: Falcons. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1912.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Painted wooden funerary figure standing upright with a stylized, wide collar and patterned chest decoration; the head is small and dark with a human-like face.
The artifact shows an anthropoid funerary figure rendered in a simplified, vertical form. The head is small with a dark, reddish-brown painted surface and a delineated face; no clear inscription is visible on the head or body. A broad, multi-colored collar/frame surrounds the neck and upper chest, with geometric bands and a central circular or oval motif. Beneath the collar, the torso includes a large rectangular panel and register-like bands, rendered in red, white, cream, and green/blue-green paint. The lower portion narrows toward the legs, and the base is a stepped, rectangular plinth with painted areas and geometric framing lines. A human figure name (e.g., Qebehsenuef) is not legible from the provided image; no cartouches are clearly visible. Overall, the style and painted decoration are consistent with a Late Period–Ptolemaic funerary wooden figure, matching the catalogue’s type.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116274527 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 12.182.37c tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 564552 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.