Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Ear plug

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19–20, ca. 1295–1070 B.C. Faience. Diam. 4.9 cm (1 15/16 in.). From: Cemetery, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1913–14. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1915.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A turquoise-blue faience ear plug/disc with concentric decorative bands and an inner sunburst-like rosette.

The image shows a small circular object with a turquoise-blue glazed surface and an eyelet/central perforation on the underside, consistent with an ear plug design. The outer face is decorated with radiating ribbing forming an arc-like sunburst pattern, separated by ring-like bands. Near the center is a seated rosette or fan-shaped motif with multiple short rays; additional ring and rib elements appear around it. No readable hieroglyphs, cartouches, or inscriptions are visible. The piece is photographed against a plain light background and appears fragmentary with cracking/chipping along the break at the lower right edge and along the rim.

decorative New Kingdom (Ramesside period), consistent with catalogue fragmentary
Materials faience (glazed ceramic)turquoise-blue glaze

Connections

Found at Lisht

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273358 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 15.3.871 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 568368 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.