Facsimile, Siptah (KV 47)
Description
Twentieth Century; original New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Siptah, A.D. 1909–1910; original ca. 1188 B.C. Tempera on Paper. H. 58.5 cm (23 1/16 in); w. 46 cm (18 1/8 in). Original from: Tomb of Siptah (KV 47), Valley of the Kings, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Credit: Gift of J. Pierpont Morgan, 1912.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Painted Egyptian hieroglyphic-themed illustration on paper showing a winged figure with a royal headdress and arms extended, accompanied by columns of hieroglyph-like signs.
The image is a colorful, flat painted scene on a light background resembling a modern facsimile. A human male figure wears a blue-and-gold nemes-like headdress with a tall, ribbon/crest element and a broad collar. He is shown in profile facing right, with one arm extended forward and the other bent. Large stylized blue-and-green wings extend behind him, arcing from left to right across the scene; the wings are segmented with red/orange striping along their edges. Around and above the figure are multiple groups of hieroglyph-like signs painted in black/red/green/blue, including rectangular cartouche-like frames and stacked sign blocks, but no clear cartouche naming Siptah can be securely read from the available image. At the bottom-right corner there is a small signature/inscription in Latin letters: "E. HAROLD JONES 1909" (or very close), indicating modern authorship rather than an ancient inscription. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The overall look and presence of the modern signature strongly support that this is a twentieth-century facsimile rather than an original New Kingdom object.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.