Part of a small block with names of the Aten preserved on opposite sides and names of Akhenaten and Nefertiti on one preserved end
Description
New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Red quartzite. H. 8.6 × W. 7.6 × D. 5.5 cm (3 3/8 × 3 × 2 3/16 in.), oriented from most complete Aten cartouche side; cartouche: 6 cm (2 3/8 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, Pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1921.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Photograph of a small, roughly rectangular/stela-like fragment of red quartzite carved in relief with a recessed cartouche-like oval and surrounding hieroglyph-like forms.
The artifact appears to be a small block fragment of red quartzite with smooth, polished surfaces and shallow relief incisions. The most distinct carved element is an oval ring containing a central dot/circle, flanked by adjacent vertical and curved signs. Additional surrounding elements are partially preserved, including a curved base form and traces of other hieroglyphic relief on the face. No clear Aten-specific solar disk rays, no complete cartouches for Akhenaten or Nefertiti, and no Greek/Coptic/Arabic text are clearly legible in this image. The background is plain white; the fragment is photographed from the carved face, with no other sides visible here.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116273650 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 21.9.6 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 567613 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.