Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Levallois Core

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Core, Levallois. Middle Paleolithic Period, ca. 240,000–40,000 B.C. Flint. From: Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Credit: Gift of C. T. Currelly, 1906.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Photograph of a single chipped stone core with a conchoidal fractured surface, shown laid flat on a light background.

The image shows one large, roughly oval/teardrop-shaped stone artifact with a dark brown outer edge and a lighter brown central face. The surfaces exhibit multiple flake scars and a few sharp ridges consistent with a worked lithic core; the top portion has a broad, flat area and surrounding steep fracture faces. No carving, relief, or engraved markings are visible beyond tool-related flake scars. A red handwritten/printed number appears near the lower right of the artifact ("08322-59" or similar), but no hieroglyphic/Greek/Coptic/Arabic script is present. No cartouches, royal names, or deities are identifiable. The material appears consistent with flint or other fine siliceous stone.

agricultural Middle Paleolithic Period (per catalogue); lithic core with flake scars good
Materials flint (likely)
Signs Red inventory/label number

Connections

Found at Deir el-Bahri
Materials Flint
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.