Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · tool

Bifacial Sickle Insert

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Neolithic–Predynastic Period, ca. 6900–3100 B.C. Flint. L. 6.4 × W. 2.4 × Th. 0.8 cm, Wt. 12.2g (2 1/2 × 15/16 × 5/16 in., 0.43oz.). From: Fayum, Egypt. Excavation: BSAE/Caton-Thompson excavations, 1924–26. Credit: Gift of The British School of Archaeology, 1926.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A dark, flaked stone blade-like implement with a bifacial working edge and a jagged silhouette, photographed against a light background.

The image shows a single small tool made of flint or similar dark chert. It has clear pressure/flaking scars across both faces, with a serrated/jagged edge along the left side and a relatively broader, flatter right face. Several areas appear lustrous or slightly lighter in color (possible patina, smoothing, or mineral staining) but there are no carved figures, inked pigments, or clear functional wear patterns that can be tied to text or iconography. The overall shape and flaking style are consistent with a bifacially worked sickle-like insert, though the exact form (insert vs. blade) cannot be confirmed from a single view.

daily life Neolithic–Predynastic (as catalogued) fragmentary
Materials flint

Connections

Materials Flint
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.