Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Amulet of Taweret

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Amulet, Taweret. Roman Period, 30 B.C.–A.D. 364. Faience, stone. h. 1.5 cm (9/16 in). From: Old Kingdom Cemetery, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations. Subject: Taweret. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1932.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

An image shows six views of small amulets depicting a standing female-front figure with arms raised/positioned near the chest, consistent with Taweret-style protectress iconography.

The photograph presents multiple small, dark-colored objects (six images arranged in two rows, with a catalog number “32.1.187” visible near the lower-left object). Several pieces are shown from different angles: the figures appear squat and molded, with a blocky head and a torso; in some views the arms are raised and held in front of the body. The top area of at least two figures suggests a head/hair mass or headdress-like projection. No clear hieroglyphs, cartouches, or alphabetic text are legible on the surfaces in the provided resolution; the surface is largely worn/rough and does not show distinct incised signs. The objects appear carved or molded in a solid material rather than being metalwork, with a pitted/worn surface texture. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is visible. The iconographic form aligns plausibly with the catalogued theme of the “Amulet of Taweret,” though the image quality and wear limit confident deity identification to “likely/consistent” rather than fully confirmatory.

religious Roman Period (per catalogue; exact dating cannot be verified visually from this image). poor
Deities Taweret
Materials stone

Connections

Found at Lisht
Deities Taweret
Materials Stone
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.