Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · tool

Tool

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Tool, blade. Early Dynastic Period, Dynasty 1–2, ca. 3100–2649 B.C. Flint. L. 5.2 × W. 1.6 × Th. 4 cm (2 1/16 × 5/8 × 1 9/16 in.). From: Osiris Temple precinct, Abydos, Northern Upper Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Egypt Exploration Fund excavations. Credit: Gift of Egypt Exploration Fund, 1902.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, elongated stone implement is shown in profile against a neutral background.

The image depicts a single, narrow tool-like object photographed from a side angle. It appears rectangular in cross-section with rounded edges and a slightly chipped surface. One end is more squared while the other end is subtly tapered/irregular. A dark gray/black patch or residue is visible along one edge and near the top surface, suggesting a working edge, hafting contact, or adhered material. No carved decoration, iconography, or readable inscriptions are visible on the object in this view. The overall appearance is consistent with a worked stone tool, though the exact material (e.g., flint) cannot be confirmed from the image alone.

daily life Early Dynastic Period (per catalogue); image details insufficient for independent refinement fragmentary
Materials worked stone

Connections

Found at Abydos
Materials Worked Stone
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.