Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · tool

Ax

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Neolithic Period, Buto–Merimda–Maadi, ca. 4500–4000 B.C. Flint. L. 10.8 × W. 5.5 × th. 2 cm, Wt. 106.8g (4 1/4 × 2 3/16 × 13/16 in., 3.767oz.). From: Merimda Beni Salama, Western Delta, Egypt. Excavation: Vienna Academy of Science excavations 1929–30. Credit: Gift of Albert Rothbart, 1933.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Photograph of a single worked stone implement shaped like a tapered blade/axe head, shown isolated against a neutral background.

The artifact appears as a roughly teardrop/tapered form with a thicker rounded proximal end and a narrower pointed distal end. The surface is uneven and shows signs of knapping/retouch consistent with a prehistoric lithic tool. Color is predominantly light brown to tan with darker patina and mineral inclusions; the edges show minor chips and irregularities rather than a finely finished cutting edge. No carvings, painted decoration, or hieroglyphic markings are visible on the stone itself. A small area of red/orange residue or label-like mark is visible near the lower left portion of the artifact, likely modern and not integral to the object. The image does not show any associated inscriptions in Greek/Coptic/Arabic or any cartouches, and no identifiable deity or royal name is present.

unclear Neolithic Period (consistent with catalogue’s Neolithic Buto–Merimda–Maadi), though the exact cultural phase cannot be confirmed from the photo alone. good
Materials stone (lithic; catalogue specifies flint)

Connections

About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.