Model of the Mastaba Tomb of Perneb
Description
Modern (model); Old Kingdom (original), Dynasty 5, end, reign of Isesi–Unis (original), Model: A.D. 1913–1916; Original ca. 2381–2323 B.C. Wood, plaster, paint. H. 38.1 cm (15 in.); W. 121.9 cm (48 in.); D. 99.1 cm (39 in.). Original from: Tomb of Perneb, Saqqara, Memphite Region, Egypt. Subject: Tombs. Credit: Museum Purchase, 1913.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A museum-made architectural model in the form of a stepped mastaba tomb, shown in three-quarter view with the front/upper section partially open to reveal internal rooms or chambers.
The image depicts a rectangular, stepped mastaba structure with a plain, sand-colored surface resembling plaster or painted coating. The model is built from block-like segments; the top is largely open/removed, exposing a recessed interior made up of lighter, plaster-like partitions forming compartments or a chamber. The base sits on a flat, brown support board. On the right-hand face, there is a small, printed or painted English label-like text (not hieroglyphic). No clearly legible hieroglyphs, royal names/cartouches, or formal inscription blocks are visible in the photographed areas. There are no clearly identifiable deities portrayed. The overall style and material appearance are consistent with a display model rather than an inscribed original tomb block.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116247941 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 2012.144 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 587738 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.