Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · ostracon

Ostracon

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Late Period–Ptolemaic Period, 400–30 B.C. Pottery, ink. 15.6 x 14.4 x 0.9 cm (6 1/8 x 5 11/16 x 3/8 in.). From: Hibis, Western Desert; Kharga Oasis, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1908–10. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1925.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A fragmentary terracotta ostracon with faint, partially preserved black/red ink traces forming indistinct marks on the surface.

The object is a small, irregular pottery fragment (ostracon) with a light brown/tan surface and reddish-brown inclusions. Faint ink strokes and smear-like markings are visible across the central area, but the characters are too eroded/low-contrast to identify specific signs confidently. No clear cartouche, deity figure, or legible Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is discernible. The writing appears to be oriented horizontally/diagonally in several diffuse strokes rather than a clearly bounded column, though the exact layout cannot be reconstructed. Edges are chipped and the fragment is incomplete.

hieroglyphic only Late Period–Ptolemaic Period (catalogue ground truth; specific period not securely identifiable from the image alone) fragmentary
Materials pottery/terracotta (ostracon fabric)ink (faint, partially preserved)
Signs indistinct ink marks / eroded hieroglyphic signs (unidentified)

Connections

Found at Hibis
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.