Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Relief fragment, tomb of Mereri

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Old Kingdom–First Intermediate Period, Dynasty 7–10, ca. 2100–2090 B.C. Limestone. H. 20.8 × W. 11.3 × D. 9.5 cm (8 3/16 × 4 7/16 × 3 3/4 in.). From: Tomb of Mereri, Behind Temple of Hathor, Dendera, Northern Upper Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: EEF excavations, 1897–98. Credit: Gift of Egypt Exploration Fund, 1898.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Carved limestone relief fragment showing a standing human figure and vertical columns of hieroglyphs beside and/or in front of the figure.

The image depicts a roughly rectangular, vertically oriented limestone relief fragment with weathering and edge losses. A standing figure is carved in raised relief at left/center, facing forward, with a long garment and a stylized head. Between the figure and the right side of the fragment are vertical stacks of hieroglyph-like signs, some still legible as small angular strokes and grouped sign forms. At the bottom there is a threshold/ground line indicated in relief. The right field contains additional vertical sign groups, but the exact reading is unclear due to damage and low resolution.

religious Old Kingdom–First Intermediate Period (catalogue ground truth); stylistic identification uncertain from this fragment alone fragmentary
Materials limestone
Signs hieroglyphic sign groups (unreadable) ×10

Connections

Found at Dendera
Materials Limestone
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.