Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Door drum section, Intef

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Old Kingdom–First Intermediate Period, Dynasty 7–10, ca. 2100–2090 B.C. Limestone. H. 8.5 × W. 9.3 × D. 5.7 cm (3 3/8 × 3 11/16 × 2 1/4 in.). From: Dendera, Northern Upper Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: EEF excavations, 1897–98. Credit: Gift of Egypt Exploration Fund, 1898.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A rectangular limestone fragment with a recessed rectangular/threshold-like motif and partial carved details on one face.

The object appears to be a small, rectangular block of pale stone (consistent with limestone) viewed front-on. The main visible decoration is a recessed, squared inner panel bordered by a raised frame, resembling a doorway or door-related element (matching the general idea of a “door drum section”). Within the recess, there are worn/abraded carved lines and blocky forms; however, the details are too eroded to securely identify specific hieroglyphs, royal names, or iconography. No clear traces of paint are visible; surface texture suggests natural weathering and chipping along edges. There is no legible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text visible in the image. Overall, the carving is shallow and partially damaged, making any specific identification beyond the door-like motif uncertain.

decorative Old Kingdom–First Intermediate Period (per catalogue; specific reign unknown) fragmentary
Materials limestone (pale, light stone)

Connections

Found at Dendera
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.