Sealing with Scarab Impressions from Heqanakht's Letters
Description
Sealing, from Heqanakht papyrus. Middle Kingdom, early Dynasty 12, reign of Senwosret I, ca. 1956–1953 B.C. Mud, string. L 2.2 × W. 1.3 cm (7/8 × 1/2 in.). From: Tomb of Ipy (TT 315, MMA 516B), Deir el-Bahri, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Credit: Bequest of Winifred Kate Purches, 2018.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small mud sealing fragment hangs on a looped string, showing a damaged male face and surrounding decorative marks resembling molded hieroglyphic-like text or seal impressions.
The object is a vertically oriented, oval/teardrop-shaped mud sealing with a suspension hole at the top. A light-colored string passes through the hole; frayed fibers extend downward. The surface preserves a molded/pressed motif in low relief: a stylized bearded man’s face (left-facing or frontal in profile) with incised features, and additional small curving/rectilinear lines below and around the head that could be part of an inscription or patterned seal decoration. No clearly formed scarab figure is visible in this image; the central relief appears to be a human head/figure rather than an obvious scarab. The lower portion is worn and cracked, and fine details are difficult to make out.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116442610 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 2018.595.2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 572490 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.