Fragments of a Canopic Jar Inscribed for Senimen
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Pottery (Marl A4), paint. No dimensions available. From: Tomb of Senimen (TT 252), Sheikh Abd el-Qurna, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1935–36. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1935.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Small fragments of an Egyptian canopic jar with painted hieroglyphic inscription visible on one piece.
The image shows multiple broken fragments of a terracotta/pottery object, consistent in shape and surface treatment with a canopic jar. One fragment on the upper left contains a compact band of black-painted hieroglyphs on the light, buff-colored ceramic. Another larger fragment below preserves part of a curved painted area. The paint appears dark (black or very dark brown) against the pale clay. No canopic-lid form or internal contents are visible due to fragmentation. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is apparent. The catalogue identifies the piece as inscribed for Senimen; however, the fragmentary hieroglyphs are not sufficiently clear to confirm the specific name “Senimen” or any royal cartouche/complete titulary in the provided image.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116445513 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 35.3.333b.1, .2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 844004 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.