Model (?) of a Hawk Wearing the Crowns of Upper and Lower Egypt
Description
<p>This sunk relief piece is broken in the back and on the edges.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/22.55' rel='external'>Model (?) of a Hawk Wearing the Crowns of Upper and Lower Egypt</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A carved black-stone relief/figure shows a hawk with outstretched wings, wearing a decorated collar and what appears to be the double crown motif on its head/upper body.
The object appears as a rounded, roughly rectangular slab of dark (black) stone with a carved hawk figure in relief on the right side. The hawk stands with legs apart and one foot slightly raised, wings spread, and a long tail extended downward. A broad, decorated collar or mantle surrounds the neck/chest region, and a crown-like element is carved over the upper head/neck area; the exact identification of the crowns (Upper/Lower Egypt) is partially ambiguous due to wear and the simplified carving, but the form is consistent with royal/cultic crown symbolism. The left portion of the slab is mostly plain stone, with the carving concentrated on the right. No clearly legible carved hieroglyphic text is visible on the face shown, and there is no discernible Greek/Coptic/Arabic writing.
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 22.55 tier-2
- Walters-id 10879 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.