Onuris Amulet
Description
<p>This amulet features Onuris standing and holding a spear in a green and white banded agate. This was probably made during the 26th Dynasty.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/42.344' rel='external'>Onuris Amulet</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Small Egyptian-style amulet portraying a standing human figure with raised arms holding a dark, ribbed object, standing on a rectangular base.
The image shows a compact, carved amulet in the form of a human figure (likely male) with a raised right arm and bent left arm. The figure’s head and torso are rendered in light material, while the hair/wig and parts of the arms/garment are in darker tones. The figure holds or supports a dark, horizontally stepped/ribbed element above the head. The body wears a short kilt or skirt in dark color with a lighter waistband; the figure stands on a small rectangular plinth. No clear hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or other inscriptions are visible. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The cataloged material is banded agate; the photo shows strong light/dark banding and carved stone/agate-like coloration, but the image does not allow definitive confirmation of “banded agate” beyond the visible banded coloration.
Connections
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 42.344 tier-2
- Walters-id 28215 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.