Tiraz fragment with repetition of Arabic ""lams""
Description
<p>Red embroidered inscription stitched onto an undyed linen ground cloth with pairs of blue stripes.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/83.553' rel='external'>Tiraz fragment with repetition of Arabic "lams"</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Textile fragment showing a narrow band with colored (green/blue/black) vertical stripes and a faded reddish woven band with repeated marks resembling Arabic letters.
The image depicts a small, torn textile fragment on a light background. Two areas of cloth are visible: a paler section at the left/top and a larger brown ground cloth strip across the middle. The main strip has several vertical dark green/blue/black stripes and a reddish band or banding across the lower portion with multiple repeated, cursive-like shapes. No clear full words, cartouches, or preserved ligatures are legible with certainty; the repeated shapes are consistent in appearance with the catalogue description of a repetition of the Arabic letter/form “lams,” but the exact characters cannot be confirmed from this image alone. No figural scenes, deities, or royal names are visible. The fragment appears to be woven/embroidered with colored threads; the back/warp details are not clearly resolvable. There is no discernible Greek/Coptic text. There is no clearly legible inscription beyond the repeated letter-like motifs in the reddish area.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Connections
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 83.553 tier-2
- Walters-id 36971 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.