Finger Ring with Names of Amun-Re in a Cartouche
Description
<p>In this greenish faience example the surface within the signs is well preserved and bluer than the rest of the ring. The inscription reads "He who is on the seat of Amun-Re'-Kamutef." This god was honored in a special cult at Karnak.</p><p>For the latest information about this object, <cite><a href='https://purl.thewalters.org/art/42.418' rel='external'>Finger Ring with Names of Amun-Re in a Cartouche</a></cite>, visit the Online Collection of the Walters Art Museum.</p>
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A pale green glazed faience finger-ring with molded hieroglyphic inscriptions and a cartouche-like frame on the bezel.
The image shows a single finger ring viewed from the face/beiél side. The bezel is oval and covered with raised (molded) signs. The signs include rectangular/cartouche-like framing elements and additional hieroglyphic strokes and wedges arranged in horizontal bands across the surface. The center area contains a complex arrangement of raised lines and shapes consistent with hieroglyphic spelling, though the exact grouping is not fully legible at this resolution. No separate Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. No cartouches are clearly readable as specific royal names; the inscription appears to be the intended divine or theonym text.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (2)
- Walters-AccNum 42.418 tier-2
- Walters-id 36076 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Walters Art Museum (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.