Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Falcon Amulet

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Late Period–Ptolemaic Period, ca. 664–30 B.C. Lapis lazuli. L. 2.6 × W. 1.4 × H. 2.7 cm (1 × 9/16 × 1 1/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Falcons. Credit: Bequest of Nanette B. Kelekian, 2020.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small blue falcon-shaped Egyptian amulet shown seated on a dark display support.

The object appears to be a miniature amulet modeled as a falcon with a defined head, beak, and wings/body indicated by shallow carving or casting. The surface is predominantly deep blue with lighter blue/gray wear or highlights, consistent with a stone or glassy material. No clear engraved hieroglyphs, cartouches, or other inscriptions are visible on the face or base. The falcon is positioned upright and seated, facing forward. The museum catalogue states lapis lazuli as the material; the image is compatible with a blue stone but the exact material cannot be confirmed visually beyond its strong blue coloration.

religious Late Period–Ptolemaic Period (per catalogue; exact date unclear from image) good
Deities Horusr (falcon deity; identified only by falcon form—uncertain)
Materials blue mineral/stone (likely lapis lazuli per catalogue; cannot be verified with certainty)

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116408118 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 2021.41.12 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 329777 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.