Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Cypriote ring based juglet

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, ca. 1500–1400 B.C. Pottery, black ware. H. 13.7 (5 3/8 in); diam. 6.5 cm (2 9/16 in). From: Tomb CC 37, Chamber B, Burial 78, Asasif, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon/Carter excavations. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1912.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small black-ware ceramic vessel with an elongated neck and a single side handle, resembling a miniature juglet or ewer.

The image shows a pottery object photographed against a neutral gray background. The vessel has a rounded globular body, a narrow cylindrical neck that flares slightly at the top, and a dark, smooth fabric consistent with black ware. A single C-shaped handle extends from the upper body area to the neck region. No surface decoration, relief, or applied motifs are clearly visible. The form appears intact from this angle, though minor surface wear and discoloration are visible near the body and handle junctions. There is no readable hieroglyphic/Greek/Coptic/Arabic text present on the visible surfaces, and no cartouche or royal name is apparent. No deities are depicted.

decorative New Kingdom (catalogue ground truth) good
Materials potteryblack ware

Connections

Found at Asasif
Materials PotteryBlack Ware

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252021 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 12.181.264 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 544022 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.