Statuette of the Child Amenemhab
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, early, reign of Ahmose I–Thutmose II, ca. 1550–1479 B.C. Bronze, separate silver lotus, wood base with pigmented inlays. h. 13 cm (5 1/8 in); w. 4.9 cm (1 15/16 in); d. 9 cm (3 9/16 in). From: Tomb CC 37, Hall (C), burial 24, inside coffin, Asasif, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon/Carter excavations, 1911. Subject: Boys, Male Nudes, Lotuses. Credit: Purchase, Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1926.
The same text in other collections
Linked by shared inventory number
(MET-Object 544451).
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- MMA 26.7.1413 PNM textAsasif
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Bronze statuette of a nude child standing with one arm raised to the chest, mounted on a rectangular dark wooden base with orange and dark painted zones.
The image shows a small bronze figure with a shaved/bald head and simplified facial features, standing upright with legs together. The left arm appears bent, with the hand placed near the chest/upper torso; the right arm hangs down along the side. The body is rendered with minimal detail; the genitals are indicated schematically. The figure is attached to a rectangular block base that is predominantly dark (black or very dark brown) with visible horizontal bands and orange/red painted decoration along the top and sides. No clear separate silver lotus element is visible in this photograph. The lighting and resolution do not make any bronze surface inscriptions or attached metal elements clearly identifiable. No hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is legible on the statue or base from this view.
Cross-references (5)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.