Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Bag-shaped Jar

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A polished travertine vessel of bag-shaped form with a wide rounded body and a narrow rim opening.

This is a finely crafted bag-shaped jar carved from translucent travertine (Egyptian alabaster), displaying excellent workmanship typical of New Kingdom stone vessels. The form is characteristic of utilitarian storage jars, with a generously rounded, bulbous body that tapers toward the neck, and a simple circular rim with a slight collar. The stone has been polished to a high sheen, and the pale honey-golden coloration of the travertine is clearly visible. The vessel shows no decorated relief or inscriptions; its aesthetic value derives purely from the quality of the stone material and the skillful execution of its elegant, minimalist form. The hollow interior and functional opening suggest use as a cosmetic container or storage vessel.

daily life New Kingdom excellent
Materials travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252001 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 44.4.82 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 544026 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.