Painted Restoration of the Hathor-Head Frieze in the Tomb of Senenmut
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Tempera on paper. Facsimile: H. 50 × W. 58.7 cm (19 11/16 × 23 1/8 in.); Scale: 1:1; Frame: H. 51.6 × W. 60.4 cm (20 5/16 × 23 3/4 in.). From: Tomb of Senenmut (TT 71), Sheikh Abd el-Qurna, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Subject: Hathor, Love-Poetry. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1937.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A painted panel shows repeated human-headed Hathor-style faces beneath striped column-like elements, with colored bands above and below a central register of small animals and motifs.
The image appears to be a restoration or reconstruction painting on a flat support rather than a single carved artifact. The upper register consists of a repeating frieze of stylized yellow-gold human faces with blue striped headdresses (Hathor-like, with cobra/feather-like elements at the sides), framed by alternating teal-and-orange cone-shaped forms. Beneath the frieze is a broader band of multicolored rectangular blocks. A lower central register contains several small motifs/animals on a light background: an eye-like form on the left, a dark scarab-like figure, a yellow bird-like figure to the right, and additional line drawings (including red/orange shapes) that may represent insects/implements or decorative elements. No clear hieroglyphic text is legible anywhere in the scene. The catalogue title refers specifically to the “Hathor-Head Frieze in the Tomb of Senenmut”; the upper repeated Hathor-like heads match this theme, and there is no visible royal name/cartouche contradicting it. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible.
Cross-references (4)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.