Two Fragments of Ceiling Patterns, Tomb of Senenmut
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Tempera on paper. facsimile: h. 18 cm (7 1/16 in); w. 53 cm (20 7/8 in), scale: 1:1. From: Tomb of Senenmut (TT 71), Sheikh Abd el-Qurna, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1931.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
The image shows two separate, brightly colored decorative ceiling-pattern fragments rendered on a light background, each composed of repeating geometric shapes and rosette-like motifs.
Two circular/arched decorative fragments are mounted side-by-side within a larger rectangular presentation. Each fragment contains a repeating grid of blue and green diamond shapes outlined with darker bands, with small red and yellow rosette/flower elements at the intersections. The left fragment includes a lower band with stylized swirling/scroll forms in teal and orange along its edge. The right fragment shows the main geometric field more fully, with its outer edge ragged or irregular as if representing a cut piece of plaster or painted ceiling. No legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or textual scripts (Greek/Coptic/Arabic) are visible; the decoration appears purely ornamental. The catalogue states the object is “Two Fragments of Ceiling Patterns, Tomb of Senenmut,” made of tempera on paper; the image is consistent with a painted drawing or rendering of ceiling patterns rather than an inscribed carved object, and there is no visible evidence contradicting the decorative ceiling-pattern subject.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.