Men Splitting Papyrus
Description
Twentieth Century; original New Kingdom, original Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, A.D. 1914–1916, original ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Tempera on Paper. facsimile: h. 40 cm (15 3/4 in.); w. 51.5 cm (20 1/4 in.); scale 1:1; framed: h. 43.5 cm (17 1/8 in.); w. 54.9 cm (21 5/8 in.). Original from: Tomb of Puyemre (TT 39), el-Khokha, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA Graphic Section, 1914-1916. Subject: Men, Working, Love-Poetry. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1930.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A painted Egyptian wall-plaque style scene shows a male figure holding a long implement over a kneeling male, with papyrus-like plants and stylized hieroglyph-like blocks in the background.
The image depicts a rectangular, framed painted composition on a light background. On the left, a standing red/orange-skinned male figure wears a patterned skirt and holds a long staff/rod aimed toward the right. On the right, a second red/orange-skinned male lies or kneels, with arms and legs posed for impact/striking. Between and around the figures are stylized, blocky elements resembling hieroglyphic columns or decorative motif rectangles; some areas show partial, faded colored strokes rather than legible text. The figures and background are rendered in flat, tempera-like pigments with visible cracks and areas of flaking consistent with age or restoration. No clear cartouches or readable Greek/Coptic/Arabic inscriptions are visible.
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.