Doorjamb from a Temple of Ramesses II
Description
Door jamb, temple of Ramesses II. New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, reign of Ramesses II, ca. 1279–1213 B.C. Granite. H. 428 × W. 139 × D. 99 cm (14 ft. 1/2 in. × 54 3/4 in. × 39 in.). From: Temple of Ramesses IV, unfinished, Asasif, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1912–13. Subject: Amun. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1913.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Carved stone doorjamb scene with two attendant figures holding a central censer/stand and dense hieroglyphic text fields.
The image shows a rectangular carved architectural element in low relief. On the left and right are standing human figures in Egyptian kilt attire, facing inward toward a central vertical element. Between them is a small stand/censer-like object with accompanying hieroglyphic signs and vertical text columns above and below. Additional hieroglyphs occupy the top register and the bottom border area, indicating a dedicatory/ritual inscription typical of temple door-jambs. No clearly legible royal cartouche or specific name is identifiable from the provided resolution. The surface appears weathered and speckled like dark stone with lighter granular texture; the exact stone type (e.g., granite) cannot be confirmed visually beyond the general stone appearance. No modern or non-Egyptian script is visible.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116247399 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 13.183.2a, b tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 544718 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.