Model of Papyrus Roll from the Tomb of Thutmose IV
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Thutmose IV, ca. 1400–1390 B.C. Faience. L. 12.6 × Dia. 4.3 cm (4 15/16 × 1 11/16 in.). From: Tomb of Thutmose IV (KV 43), Valley of the Kings, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Davis/Carter excavations, 1903. Credit: Theodore M. Davis Collection, Bequest of Theodore M. Davis, 1915.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Small turquoise-blue faience object photographed against a neutral background, with a dark rectangular sign area incised or inlaid near the center.
The object appears as a vertically oriented rectangular pillar or fragment with rounded edges. The surface is predominantly bright blue with speckling and losses that expose a lighter substrate beneath. Near the middle of the front face there is a dark, vertically oriented rectangular field containing what may be clustered black marks resembling a hieroglyphic-like sign or cartouche fragment; surrounding details are not clearly legible at this resolution. No other clearly distinguishable carved figures, papyrus-roll spiral shapes, or additional iconography are visible. There is no readable Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text in the image. Overall the artifact seems weathered/fragmentary, with multiple chips and flaking along the edges. The catalogue describes it as a “Model of Papyrus Roll from the Tomb of Thutmose IV,” but in this image the papyrus-roll form is not clearly identifiable; only a generic faience fragment with a possible sign is visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116413694 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 30.8.32 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 544838 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.