Unfinished Votive Stela of Ptah
Description
Caption: Unfinished Votive Stela of Ptah, ca. 1539–1075 B.C.E.. Limestone, 5 9/16 × 3 3/8 × 3/4 in. (14.1 × 8.6 × 1.9 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Evangeline Wilbour Blashfield, Theodora Wilbour, and Victor Wilbour honoring the wishes of their mother, Charlotte Beebe Wilbour, as a memorial to their father, Charles Edwin Wilbour, 16.91. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small, roughly rectangular limestone stela fragment showing incised outlines of a standing figure and surrounding hieroglyphic-like framework, with much of the work unfinished.
The artifact is a small, vertically oriented, roughly rectangular stone plaque with rounded top and flat sides, preserved only on the front. The surface shows incomplete/unfinished carving: a central column contains the lower part of a standing figure’s legs and a vertical set of incised lines resembling the torso/arms area, while faint framing elements suggest the layout of hieroglyphs or a register. Along the lower edge there are partial rectangular/block elements that look like the beginnings of carved text blocks, but the majority of the inscription details are either shallow, broken away, or too indistinct to read. No painted pigment is visible; marks appear to be tool incisions and stone pitting/erosion. A small metal support pin is visible at the bottom, but it is not part of the original object. Overall, the image supports that it is a votive stela-type piece, but the specific dedicatory name/figure attributes cannot be confidently identified from the current view.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 16.91 tier-2
- BKM-Object 9349 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.