Hieratic ostracon recording the accession of Seti II
Description
New Kingdom, Ramesside, Dynasty 19, Reign of Seti II, ca. 1200–1194 B.C. Limestone, paint. H. 15.5 × W. 15 × D. 2.8 cm (6 1/8 × 5 7/8 × 1 1/8 in.). From: Valley of the Kings, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Davis excavations, before 1913. Subject: Hieratic. Credit: Gift of Theodore M. Davis, 1913.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A roughly rectangular limestone ostracon fragment covered with dark ink hieratic (cursive) writing arranged in lines across the surface.
The image shows a light gray, broken limestone ostracon (rectangular/irregular fragment) photographed against a dark background. Dark, reddish-brown to black pigment forms multiple horizontal and slightly staggered lines of hieratic script that fill much of the visible face. The writing includes clusters of rectilinear signs and some longer strokes that suggest a continuous administrative/literary text rather than isolated labels. No cartouche frame is clearly visible at this resolution, and no deity iconography appears—only writing. The object is mounted on a small modern stand; small edges chips and surface wear indicate age and fragmentation. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116244994 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 14.6.217 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 545194 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.