Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Game piece in the shape of a baboon

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Game piece, baboon. Ptolemaic Period, 332–30 B.C. Bone. H. 3.4 cm (1 5/16 in.); W. 1.9 cm (3/4 in.); D. 1.8 cm (11/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Games, Baboons. Credit: Ludlow Bull Fund, 1968.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small carved object shaped like a standing primate (baboon-like) with its head turned upward and arms raised.

The image shows a light-colored, carved, figurative object photographed against a neutral gray background. The figure has a rounded head with a short, defined snout/muzzle and a raised, bent arm posture; the body is squat and stylized, with minimal anatomical detail beyond the head and arms. The surface shows tool marks and slight wear, with darker areas in carved recesses suggesting pigment is unlikely but shadows highlight the incisions. No separate base, inscriptions, or associated iconographic elements are visible. The object appears to be a single piece with a smooth, polished look consistent with worked hard material.

daily life Ptolemaic Period (as catalogued); style appears consistent with small carved sculptural game pieces, but exact dating cannot be confirmed from the image alone. good
Materials bone

Connections

Materials Bone

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116244847 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 68.3 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 545212 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.