Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · architecture

Fragment of Spoon in Form of Lotus

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Spoons Elaborate burials often included offerings of spoons with decorated bowls and handles, though their purpose is uncertain. Early Egyptologists proposed that the spoons were used to remove solid ointments from wide-necked jars. Although many scholars still favor this traditional interpretation, others believe the spoons were cultic objects used in religious ceremonies. They probably served both functions: spoons decorated with images of birth-gods seem appropriate for domestic use; those with symbols of rebirth, such as the lotus, were probably intended for rituals. Caption: Fragment of Spoon in Form of Lotus, ca. 1539–1292 B.C.E.. Wood, 2 3/4 × 5 1/2 in. (7 × 14 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.606E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A carved wooden fragment depicting vultures with spread wings.

The artifact is a carved wooden piece showing vultures with their wings spread in a stylized manner, suggesting artistic representation typical of Egyptian art. The composition features intricate detailing, with each vulture's feathers and body meticulously depicted. The style indicates relief carving, commonly seen in decorative or ceremonial artifacts.

decorative New Kingdom fragmentary
Materials wood

Connections

Found at Saqqara
Materials Wood

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.606E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 4057 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.