Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · statue

Apis Bull Statuette

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Statuette, Apis bull. Late Period, Dynasty 26–30, 664–343 B.C. Elephant ivory. L. 9.2 × W. 4 × D. 6.9 cm (3 5/8 × 1 9/16 × 2 11/16 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Bulls. Credit: Gift of J. Pierpont Morgan, 1917.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small carved bovine figure posed in profile on a rectangular base, with visible decorative linework on the body and a raised tail.

The object is a statuette of a bull/cow-like animal shown standing in profile facing right. The head has pronounced ears and a slightly arched neck; the muzzle is simplified and the horns are not clearly detailed beyond the head outline. The torso and legs are carved in a naturalistic style, with incised or engraved geometric/striped patterns on the body and upper flank (including a long central panel and subsidiary bands). The tail hangs down with the end carved in a curled/leaf-like form. The statuette rests on a flat rectangular base with a thin darker outline or edge along the base perimeter. No clear inscriptions, cartouches, or text are visible on the animal or base in this image. The surface appears light-colored and polished, consistent with carved ivory/ivory-like material, though the exact material cannot be verified beyond visual appearance.

royal Late Period good
Deities Apis (bull)
Materials carved ivory/ivory-like material (light colored)

Connections

Deities Apis
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.