Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Jar Lid with Human Face

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: The absence of any trace of shoulders indicates that this limestone head was never part of a complete sculpture. It probably served as the lid of a canopic jar, a vessel containing a corpse’s vital organs that were removed during mummification. The artist who carved this face followed the dominant style of mid-Twelfth Dynasty, including full, fleshy cheeks, wide open eyes with a high, arcing upper lid, and an overall sense of serenity. Caption: Jar Lid with Human Face, ca. 1876–1837 B.C.E.. Limestone, 4 × 4 7/16 × 4 1/16 in. (10.2 × 11.2 × 10.3 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Purchased with funds given by Christos G. Bastis and Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 87.78. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A carved limestone head depicting an Egyptian male figure with a nemes headdress.

The artifact is a finely carved limestone sculpture depicting the head of an Egyptian man. The figure is wearing a nemes headdress, which is intricately detailed with lines to represent pleats. The facial features are well-defined, with a serene expression and a prominent false beard indicating royal or divine status. The style and craftsmanship suggest an emphasis on symmetry and idealized facial features typical of ancient Egyptian art.

royal New Kingdom good
Materials limestone

Connections

Found at Egypt
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 87.78 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3924 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.