Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · other

Game Piece

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Senet (the passing) was one of the most popular and enduring board games in ancient Egypt. Players moved their gaming pieces along a rectangular board of thirty squares arranged in three parallel rows. Although this blue glazed faience board resembles the traditional senet playing surface, it has only twenty-one squares. Perhaps it was intended as a funerary offering that merely represented a senet board. Although the board and “pawns” displayed here may have formed a set, they could have been assembled from several sources. Caption: Game Piece, ca. 1938–1700 B.C.E.. Faience, 1 1/16 x Diam. 11/16 in. (2.7 x 1.7 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 36.3.11. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The object is a small, cone-shaped artifact with a blue-green glaze.

The artifact is a modestly sized, conical object featuring a blue-green faience glaze. Its surface is textured, with an irregular pattern that may suggest a naturalistic or abstract design. The colors transition from dark to light in a mottled fashion, likely due to variations in the glaze application. The object lacks any discernible inscriptions or detailed decorative elements.

unclear unknown good
Materials faience

Connections

Found at Egypt
Materials Faience

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 36.3.11 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3386 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.