Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Hair pin

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 12, late–13 to 1700 B.C., ca. 1850–1700 B.C. Ivory. l. 8.5 cm (3 3/8 in). From: south of Tomb of Nakht (493), south cemetery, Pit 453, Lisht North, Memphite Region, Egypt. Excavation: MMA excavations, 1913–14. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1915.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, straight ivory object resembling a hair pin, shown in profile with a slightly thicker, ridged section at one end.

The image shows a single elongated implement laid horizontally on a light background. One end appears slightly thicker and features narrow circumferential ridges (a grip/attachment area), while the opposite end tapers subtly. No carved decoration, relief, or legible inscriptions are visible on the surface; the object is photographed in neutral lighting that highlights its smooth, pale material. The ridging near one end is the only clearly distinguishable feature.

daily life Middle Kingdom (per catalogue) good
Materials ivory

Connections

Found at Lisht
Materials Ivory

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116280866 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 15.3.133 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 546684 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.