Fragment with Aten cartouche
Description
New Kingdom, Amarna Period, Dynasty 18, reign of Akhenaten, ca. 1353–1336 B.C. Indurated limestone. H. 8.6 × W. 2.6 × D. 2.4 cm (3 3/8 × 1 × 15/16 in.); Estimated Cartouche: W. 1.8 cm (11/16 in.). From: Great Temple of the Aten, Pit outside southern wall, Amarna (Akhetaten), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Petrie/Carter excavations, 1891–92. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1921.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A carved limestone fragment showing part of a relief with curved cartouche-like ornamentation on one face.
The object is a small, vertically oriented fragment of pale, weathered stone, likely limestone. One broad face preserves low-relief carving with a curved, hook-like element and adjacent incised lines forming what could be part of a royal name/cartouche frame. A raised, rounded border element appears near the lower left of the preserved area; however, the interior signs of any cartouche are largely broken off, and no fully legible hieroglyphic sequence is visible in the image. No clear Aten-specific solar disk rays or fully identifiable divine symbols are present due to breakage and limited visibility. The reverse/other faces are mostly plain and damaged. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116272839 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 21.9.459 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 550035 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.