Model ax
Description
Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 12, ca. 1981–1802 B.C. Copper, wood, animal hide. l. 5.7 cm (2 1/4 in). From: Tomb of Ankhef (Tomb 9), Asyut (Lykopolis), Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Khashaba excavations. Credit: Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1917.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Photograph of a small Egyptian implement resembling an ax: a long wooden handle attached to a rounded dark metal blade head with a cord/binding around the join.
The object is shown isolated against a light background. A straight, cylindrical wooden handle extends horizontally to the left. At the right end, the handle enters a rounded, shield-like head/blade element; the head surface appears dark brown to black with reddish-orange corrosion or patination. Several turns of a braided cord or leather thong are wrapped tightly around the junction, securing the head to the handle; a small flap/loose binding is visible on the top-left of the head. Near the binding on the head there is a small vertical mark with legible characters that look like an Arabic-Indic numeral or letter form, but the text is too unclear to transcribe reliably. No clear Egyptian hieroglyphs, cartouches, or royal names are visible. No deities are depicted.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116281789 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 17.9.16 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 546207 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.