Flail of Hapiankhtifi
Description
Scepter, Hapiankhtifi. Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 12, ca. 1981–1802 B.C. Wood, gold leaf, carnelian, faience. L. 52.8 cm (20 13/16 in.). From: Tomb of Hapiankhtifi, Mummy, Meir, Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Khashaba excavations, 1910–12. Credit: Gift of J. Pierpont Morgan, 1912.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
The image shows an elongated ceremonial flail-like object with a long handle and a beaded terminal near one end.
The artifact consists of a mostly wooden or wooden-covered long handle with a slightly tapering end. Near the opposite end of the handle is a vertical cluster of decorative cords/straps holding multiple dark and light bead-like elements in green, turquoise/blue-green, and reddish tones. The central decorative section includes several dangling bead strings, with a few larger green-blue beads and smaller reddish beads in between. The surface of the handle appears worn, with visible dark banding/paint or inlaid segments along parts of its length. No clear animal, human, or divine figure is visible. No clearly readable hieroglyphs are present on the handle or the decorative section in this image. There is no visible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text. Based on the visible bead colors, the object likely includes faience and/or semi-precious stone components as part of the decoration, but the materials cannot be confirmed beyond what is visually suggested.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116281563 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 12.183.15a–g tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 546288 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.