Bat Amulet of Hapiankhtifi
Description
Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 12, ca. 1981–1802 B.C. Wood, gold leaf. h. 13.2 cm (5 3/16 in); w. 8.8 cm (3 7/16 in). From: Tomb of Hapiankhtifi, Mummy, Meir, Middle Egypt, Egypt. Excavation: Khashaba excavations, 1910–12. Credit: Gift of J. Pierpont Morgan, 1912.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A roughly rectangular, wooden Egyptian amulet shaped like a vertical “bat” form, with a worn gold-leafed surface on the upper portion and red/brown pigment remnants below.
The image shows a single small Egyptian object photographed against a light background. The object has a rounded, bulging top and narrows toward the bottom, forming a stylized bat/amulet body. The top area appears coated with a lighter, abraded gold-colored layer (consistent with gold leaf) set into the dark brown, cracked wood. The central and lower surfaces are dark brown to reddish with extensive flaking, cracking, and losses; faint incised or painted lines are visible in places but are too damaged to read reliably. No clear cartouche, legible deity name, or complete hieroglyphic sequence can be confirmed from the current image. Condition is poor due to heavy surface cracking, abrasion, and missing details.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116281675 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 12.183.22 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 546297 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.