Lintel block from the false door of Mery's chapel
Description
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 4, ca. 2575–2520 B.C. Limestone. L. 90.2 cm (35 1/2 in.). From: Djoser precinct, north of the Step Pyramid, Saqqara, Memphite Region, Egypt. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Gift of Mrs. Edmund Lassalle, 1967.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A rectangular limestone lintel block is shown with incised/painted relief hieroglyphs and parts of a human figure seated between register-like elements.
The object appears as a long, horizontal stone block with a smoothed rectangular outline. The surface is densely covered by carved hieroglyphs and decorative relief. Near the center-left there is a kneeling/seated human figure in profile (details partially worn), accompanied by surrounding hieroglyphic signs. Above and around the figure are additional large, stylized signs and short vertical lines consistent with a false door/chapel lintel layout, though the exact arrangement and full reading are not fully legible due to wear and cropping of some edges. No modern inscriptions or colors are clearly visible beyond the stone surface; the relief lines are shallow to moderate depth. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116276433 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 67.50 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 547737 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.