Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · vessel

Jar from Djoser’s Pyramid Complex

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Jar from Djoser’s Pyramid Complex, ca. 2675–2625 B.C.E.. Egyptian alabaster (calcite), 24 5/8 x 8 13/16 in. (62.5 x diam. 22.4 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 34.976.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A cylindrical alabaster (calcite) jar with a rounded rim, photographed against a plain background.

The image shows a tall, narrow, cylindrical jar with a slightly flared/rounded rim and a smooth, polished surface. The body appears uninscribed or any markings are too faint to read at this resolution. Color variation and minor surface abrasions/striations are visible, consistent with stone wear. No legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or figural decoration are visible on the jar. The overall form and material match the catalogue’s identification as an alabaster jar from the Old Kingdom Saqqara area (Djoser’s pyramid complex), though the image does not show any explicit royal name to confirm it visually.

decorative Old Kingdom (as catalogued) good
Materials stonealabaster (calcite)

Connections

Found at Saqqara
Royals Djoser
Materials StoneAlabaster

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 34.976 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3330 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.