Padiamunrenebwaset, son of Irethoreru, holding a seated statue of Osiris
Description
Ptolemaic Period, 4th century B.C., late. Green schist. H. 22.5 × W. 10.4 × D. 12.2 cm, 2 kg (8 7/8 × 4 1/8 × 4 13/16 in., 4.4 lb.). From: Temple of Amun, Cachette, Karnak, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Subject: Men. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1907.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A dark stone seated/standing figure is shown holding a small seated god/symbolic figure on its lap, with a stylized head and hands clasped in front.
The artifact appears to be a statue in a dark greenish/black stone. The larger figure has a smooth, idealized face with a headdress or closely fitted covering; one side shows a distinct ear. The arms are held close to the body, with both hands brought forward to support a smaller seated figure (or icon) placed between the arms and at chest level. The smaller figure has a pointed crown/hat-like top and sits upright with arms crossed or held close to the torso, suggesting a divine representation. No clear carved hieroglyphs or readable inscriptions are visible in the provided image, and no Greek/Coptic/Arabic text can be identified. Lighting and surface reflections obscure fine details, so the exact iconographic identification of the small seated figure beyond “Osirian/seated god form” is somewhat unclear, but it is consistent with the catalogue’s description of holding a seated statue of Osiris.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116276301 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 07.228.33 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 547803 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.