Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Portrait of a young woman with a gilded wreath

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Roman Period, A.D. 120–140. Encaustic on wood with gold leaf. H. 36.5 x W. 17.8 cm (14 3/8 x 7 in.). From: Egypt. Subject: Portraits, Women, Wreaths. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1909.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image shows a painted Egyptian-style female portrait on a vertical wooden panel, with a gold-toned (gilded) wreath or halo behind the head and a modest head covering.

A rectangular, vertically oriented wooden panel is painted in encaustic style. The woman’s face is frontal with large painted eyes, pale complexion, and a small mouth; her hair/head area is framed by a broad gold leaf wreath/halo with dark painted decoration across it. She wears earrings (small loop/round forms), and layered neck adornments consisting of beaded/gem-like collar elements and a broader collar/garment at the chest. The background around the gold wreath and the garment below are painted in muted earth tones (gray-beige and dark brown/black), with gold leaf used prominently for the wreath/halo. No clearly legible hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible in the provided image. No cartouche or royal name is identifiable.

daily life Roman Period (as catalogued; image style consistent, but exact dating cannot be confirmed from text) good
Materials wood panelgold leafpainted/encaustic surface

Connections

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116276276 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 09.181.7 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 547861 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.